Shabelle Media: Heavy fighting and shelling kills 5, wounds 15 others in Mogadishu
at least 5 people have been killed and 15 others have been wounded after fresh fighting with heavy shelling broke out in several neighborhoods in the Somali capital Mogadishu, officials told Shabelle radio on Wednesday.
Reports say that the fighting started at Mekka Al-mukarama street, a key road that connects the presidential palace and Km4, a base for the African Union troops AMSIOM as the AU troops tried to start military movement around there and blockaded the streets which caused to spread the war into further districts like Hodan, Hawl-wadag and Waberi all in the Somali capital Mogadishu.
Reports also indicate that more than 5 people died during the fighting including government officer and a teenager who was at around Dabka intersection in Mogadishu as bitter shelling from the side of the AMSIOM troops were landing into many areas in Bakara Market.
Mareeg Online adds
Reports indicate that tanks of AMISOM were seen in Dabka Street and Tripunka area in Mogadishu where they did not use to come.
Continuing with the Shabelle Media report,
Officials from Harakat Al-shabab Mujahideen had claimed victory over today’s fighting in Mogadishu saying that they burnt one of the armed vehicles of the African Union troops AMISOM pointing out that they also inflicted more casualties to the allied soldiers of the TFG and the AU.
Eyewitnesses told Shabelle’s Mohamed Bashir that three passengers were also wounded at the front gate of Kulliyad Jalle Sia’d, the main base of the Burundian troops as a truck driver of a mini bus they traveling stopped there which caused the AU troops especially Burundians to open fire and wound three of the passengers while the others escaped from the accident.
Shabelle contacted with the spokesman of AMISOM troops asking why their forces blocked the streets of Mogadishu and also what military movement they did and replied that it was normal for the AMSIOM troops make movement or petrol in the areas of their bases in Mogadishu asserting that they could go further areas out the capital.
Most of the people died or wounded in the clashes between the transitional government soldiers backing by AMISOM troops and Islamist fighters were civilians and were rushed to the hospitals in Mogadishu according to Ali Muse, an official of the emergency.
An APA article reported
The fighting began when Islamist fighters attacked the African peace keepers’ base in the capital, then triggering heavy fighting followed shelling.
Residents said that heavy shelling was coming from the bases of AU peace keepers in Mogadishu after the clash.
“I witnessed three civilians were killed in the battle,” Hassan Omar, resident in bakro market said.
“They died when shell landed on the village,” he added.
“You can’t imagine what happened in early morning of this day,” he said.
Matthew Russell Lee at Inner City Press on Tuesday pointed out the blatant lying of the UN's Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs Pascoe B. Lying... oops, that is supposed to read B. Lynn Pascoe, regarding last week's deadly shelling which killed dozens of civilians
On Somalia, UN's Pascoe Blames Shabaab for Marketplace Shelling
UNITED NATIONS, October 27 -- Having been turned back from Somali airspace during a mortar attack on the Mogadishu airport, the UN's political chief Lynn Pascoe on Tuesday presented to the Press a rosy picture of successful peacekeeping by Burundi and Uganda. Inner City Press asked about reports that these African Union peacekeepers fired into a marketplace and residential neighborhoods, killing at least twenty civilians.
"It depends on what kind of story you're trying to write," Pascoe answered, repeating the claim that Al Shabaab has been shelling the neighborhoods it controls in order to blame the AU peacekeepers. Video here, from Minute 12:15.
How about one that's honest and accurate, Pascoe?
As I linked in last week's thread, even CNN reported that the shelling was coming from the AMISOM compound.
Journalists saw shell fire coming from AMISOM -- the African Union Mission in Somalia -- strongholds in a fortified district of the capital and from near the airport. AMISOM is the only force in the area believed to have the firepower capable of such an intense attack.
Yet here's a top UN official telling the press that instead Harakat Al Shabaab Mujahideen actually shelled the market to turn the population against AMISOM (because everyone knows how much Somali's love foreign troops on their soil propping up a foreign-created transitional government imposed on them). I guess that "story" only works on audiences who have no idea what is actually taking place in Mogadishu, or of the long history of indiscriminate shelling of Bakara Market and the surrounding neighborhoods, and whom otherwise accept official statements at face value (read: your typical reporter these days).
And yet some still wonder why the insurgent groups are having issues with UN missionaries in Somalia.
Continuing with the Inner City Press dispatch,
Al Shabaab has threatened to target Burundi and Uganda for the incident. Inner City Press asked Pascoe if that might impact his upbeat story of a growing AU force in Somalia. "Threats and statements are just threats and statements," Pascoe said. Video here, from Minute 20:08. He said that the two countries are there because they perceive a threat from Somalia to their own peace and security.
The threat Somalia poses to Burundi is not entirely clear. Nor is the legality of Uganda's new screening of all Somalis in its territory, as an anti-terrorism measure. On that, Inner City Press asked Charles Petrie, now the deputy to Ould Abdallah at the UN's mission to Somalia, based in Nairobi, if it is true that the U.S. is withholding $50 million in food aid in connection with an internal investigation by the UN World Food Program of alleged diversions.
Petrie said to "ask the State Department," and claimed it is not really about WFP. But WFP has admitted it is investigating itself. So which is it? Petrie dismissed claims by Somalis that food is being used as a political weapon, saying that there are spoilers in Somalia who are "on lists." Video here, from Minute 21:59.
Later on Tuesday, Inner City Press asked Richard Barrett of the UN's Al Queda / Taliban Sanctions committee about this withholding of aid, and if there is any proof linking Al Shabaab to Al Qaeda. Barrett repeated what he had said in July, that Al Shabaab praises Al Qaeda. Video here. But is that the standard of proof?
These fools are certain to get stuck eventually, sticking, as they do, to their phoney narrative.
I have not come across an objective analysis of the "at your service" video Barrett is referring to, which came to light courtesy of the likes of MEMRI and the NEFA Foundation, both of which appear to be outlets for disseminating intelligence agency created propaganda, but it has plant written all over it. I've covered some of this in the threads touching on Abu Mansour al-Amriki, who does seem to have disappeared after it was reported that a little bird picked him up during Operation Celestial Balance.
WRT Pascoe's contention that Uganda and Burundi participated in AMISOM because 'they perceive a threat to their own peace and security', the reality is more likely their relationships with the US military. Neither share a border with Somalia, and each only hosts a small Somali community.
Interestingly, a commentary posted at Wardheer News on Wednesday raises another possible motive for the targeting of the Bakara Market, this one being economic:
An Atrocious act of Inhumanity at the Bakaraha Market
Yes! The claim is made that Bakaraha has transformed into the command center and the hub of Al-Shabab where all the attacks against the government are hatched up. However; the fact remains that it also serves as the nerve center of the country’s economic activity. It is indefensible to knowingly target it with the full knowledge that thousands of innocent people gather to shop and trade in the open market.
Clearly; shelling the market over and over again has not brought its collapse except of course causing utter terror and mass killing. Then what is the strategic goal or objective behind it? One can not help but suspect other motives. Could it perhaps be to eliminate the fierce competition posed by the entrepreneurial nature of the Somalis in countries donating peace keepers to Somalia?
There is no question that there is deep seated envy and jealousy of the reach and power of the Somali business people in the entire East African markets. The bargains and quality of goods Somalis offer in Kenya, Tanzania, Ethiopia and Uganda has generated a feeling of discomfort to say the least or an outright resentment often manifested in violence. Take the innumerable cases of violence committed against Somalis in South Africa and Kenya.
Now; the patrimonial relationship between the ruling elite of East Africa and the business sector is well established fact. Thus; it is not completely implausible that successes Somalis have achieved in those countries presents unwelcome competition and poses direct threat to the earning power of top ruling echelons or government officials of nations providing peace keeping forces to Somalia.
Moreover; the pervasive notion held throughout East Africa that the Somalis enjoy unfair competitive advantage as a result of the lawlessness in their country where no tariffs are paid allows them to offer cheaper bargain prices are unsubstantiated. There is also a widely circulated rumor that the Bakaraha market is the logistical hub and supply center where all goods shipped to east Africa originate.
Therefore; if the opportunity presents itself to cripple rivals who pose credible threat to diminish one’s income levels, and deal with them once and for all to drive them out of business, why not? Could this possibly explain why the market is incessantly bombarded?
Not to say that's not a motive -- a lesser motive at any rate -- but the market has been shelled somewhat consistently since the Ethiopian occupation moved into Mogadishu, while the first AMISOM forces were just beginning to arrive. A better explanation is that the shelling is simply a counterinsurgency tactic, designed to drain the water the insurgency swims in. And, of course, as we've seen many time before, when taking fire themselves, the poorly trained forces typically respond by indiscriminately retaliating against anything that moves, be it a busload of civilians, some camels, or kids playing in the street.
Which really makes one wonder about this 2007 US military public affairs story:
Airmen provide optometry care to deploying African troops
11/26/2007 - SPANGDAHLEM AIR BASE, Germany (AFPN) -- Air Force optometry speicialists provided eye care to two battalions of African military members prior to the battalions leaving on a peace keeping mission in Somalia.
...
The team was sent to provide optometry and eye care because International Crisis Operations and Peace Keeping trainers reported that individual weapons qualifications and accuracy beyond 50 meters were hindered due to poor eyesight. The trainers placed a request for an eye-care team to evaluate and provide glasses for the two battalions.
The 52nd AMDS Optometry Flight was given four duty days to build their team and gather the necessary equipment to deploy into the austere environment.
...
To provide glasses to the patients, fabrication and delivery was arranged via an Army optical lab in Kuwait.
"At the end of each day, we coordinated with embassy staff to scan the prescriptions, then e-mail them to the lab," Sergeant Gonzalez said. "We got so efficient at the whole process that by the time we sent them the next day's worth of prescriptions, the lab had already made the previous day's worth."
Certainly would explain alot, except one has to take into account troop rotations. At the time I had assumed the apparently heavy demand for eyeglasses at the last moment before the Burundi troops hopped on the shuttle for Mogadishu may have signified that the soldiers were signing contracts for deployment they couldn't even read. Maybe that's another explanation for Burundi's involvement. :)
Anyway, while it wasn't Bakara Market this time, Garowe Online reported that indiscriminate shelling by AMISOM forces killed even more civilians last Sunday.
5 killed in Mogadishu shelling, military court opens
According to witnesses, the shelling started Sunday afternoon following insurgent mortars launched at the bases of Somali government forces and African Union peacekeepers (AMISOM), who responded by shelling the launching areas.
"The shells hit residential homes and I saw five dead bodies," said witness Ali Ahmed, who lives in Mogadishu's Yaaqshiid district.
Mogadishu ambulance workers said 20 wounded civilians were rushed to medical centers for treatment.
-- -- --
Michael Weinstein's latest analysis is available at Garowe Online and delves into the economic motives behind the factional disputes in Kismayo, citing a closed source in the region.
The Struggle for Kismayo and Clan-Based Islamist Warlordism
None of these tensions, of course, spells self-destruction, but only fragmentation and realignment along the lines of calculations of positional advantage by the myriad actors.
-- -- --
[A response to the anonymous comment below, posted here since there is a limit to the size of posts there:]
Welcome Anon, but fallacious trickery such as the untrue premise of "you really think that Shabaab al-Mujahideen propaganda is all created by intel agencies" won't play very well nor win you much respect. There's a web trail out there of everything I have covered on the subject over the years which clears up any misunderstanding you may have in regard to your claims.
Which leadership of which Shabaab brigade did you have in mind?
Here's Mukhtar Robow, for instance, from his March 9, 2009 al-Jazeera interview as the official spokesperson for the mvmt
Al-Jazeera: There are people who say that your group has close relations with Al-Qa'idah, what is the truth of the matter?
Abu Mansur: The relation we have with them is the same as the one all muslims have with other fellow muslims. It is an Islamic principle [quotes an Arabic phrase meaning support them or oppose them, which is to distance yourself from the unbelievers and be close to fellow Muslims and love them. That is the kind of relationship we have [with Al-Qa'idah]. They pray for us and we pray for them.
They sometimes broadcast advice on the internet which is very beneficial to us or sometimes they send us messages via the internet and we are very excited about that, last of which was the tape sent by our brother, Abu Yahya Al-Libiyi.
We are usually very pleased with such statements. There is no close relationship between our two groups in such a way that they are part of us or we are part of them, but we belong together as Muslims. They are mujahidin and our enemies are one, they fight the Americans and we fight them. They fight the other unbelievers whom we also fight. They want to implement Shari'ah law and so do we.
We are opposed to the fake borders that have been established by the colonialists banning people from Iraq to go to Jordan or the Saudi to go to Yemen. We are saying that all Muslim countries be united as one and they also want the same thing. That is all there is to it. We are not part of them but we love them very much.
A lot of ink has been spilled trying to draw up a more clandestine relationship between Robow and Al-Libiyi, but they're entirely off the page.
What Robow states in that interview, as he did in a previous lengthy al-Jazeera sitdown, is the same sentiment I have found listening to others in the Islamist mvmts in Somalia.
For instance, Hassan Turki, while not part of Harakat al-Shabaab Mujahideen himself, has appeared w/ alleged AQ affiliates yet publicly defined the limits of those relationships as along the lines of 'we are brothers but their fight is not our fight and our fight is not theirs. We do not need them in our affairs.' I don't have the transcript at hand so I am paraphrasing there, but it shouldn't be surprising if you are at all familiar w/ Turki or Awey's al-Itihaad al-Islami nationalist movement, which was also erroneously exaggerated back in the 90s to have threatening ties to AQ. Ethiopia, in particular, is very good at playing the AQ threat card and getting an influx of military and financial assistance to further their own interests. In fact, after the current transitional president Sh. Sharif was advised in his meeting w/ PM Meles to play the AQ-in-Somalia GWOT card, the former turned on a dime, suddenly screaming 'AQ is here - this is now an international conflict - send more money, troops and weapons' whereas prior to that he had strongly denied that AQ could ever take root among Somalis, for all the obvious reasons.
Are there other certain mujahideen in Somalia who get mileage out of playing up links to AQ? Of course there are. As we saw w/ the poster boy al-Amriki. And there are plenty of quotes circulating from what are described as unnamed mujahideen, claiming they're not allowed to speak on-the-record in official capacity.
Robow addresses some of that in the linked transcript as well. And he outlines the mvmts overall ambitions, certainly less fiery that what gets reported in the dailies.
But Al Shabaab is not a centralized, or even unified, homogenous entity. And even Robow himself had stretched the truth at times in briefings for various reasons, including, it appeared, nothing more than to annoy the real-life foreigners meddling in Somali affairs.
But this sure does seem to be what the US wants - a self-fulfilling illusion that if they just keep plugging away, year after year, claiming that somehow non-state ideologically-aligned political Islamists will thrive in an unstable & hostile country like Somalia and create a base from which to present a serious threat to a superpower and its numerous allies across the globe, that eventually they will succeed in shaping that reality.
the media certainly help in that regard, w/ their unquestioning boilerplate phrases in any article on the Shabaab - "which Washington says is linked to AQ".."which intelligence official says is affiliated with AQ"..and so on.
Just keep repeating the message and eventually enough people assume it's common knowledge, which may be the case w/ Barrett cited above.
As Aweys told Kevin Sites back in 2005,
"The only reason Western powers say that al-Qaida is in Somalia is because they are afraid that Somalia will become an Islamic state and they will do everything they can to stop that," Aweys says. "I believe there's not even one person in Somalia connected to al-Qaida. We are one clan, one color, one language. We would not accept foreigners (al-Qaida) here."
...
"The FBI, people like you (journalists) and other groups who are often in the shadows always say al-Qaida is in Somalia," says Aweys, dismissively.
Interim President Abdullahi Yusuf Ahmed "also said two years ago there were al-Qaida training camps here. Well, the FBI came here, journalists came here and there were no training camps. It's just not true. We all know each other in Somalia. We would know if al-Qaida was here."
Aweys says he is, however, sympathetic to "jihads" being waged against Western forces around the world.
"If you lock a cat in a room all the time," Aweys says, "what do you think it will do? It's going to fight back."
And speaking of 'locking a cat in a room', back in March of 2008, in response to being notified of the official US designation of the group as a terrorist organization, the Reuters article "Somali Islamists say US terror listing forges unity" gives an idea of what company the cat will be forced to be "affiliated" with by default
MOGADISHU, March 21 (Reuters) - Islamist insurgents in Somalia say their inclusion on a U.S. terrorism list will help recruiting and has spurred them to strengthen ties with other groups blacklisted by Washington.
"We were not terrorists," rebel commander Mukhtar Ali Robow told Reuters by telephone from an undisclosed location.
"But now we've been designated ... we have been forced to seek out and unite with any Muslims on the list against the United States," he said late on Thursday.
At the same time, Robow told the BBC that
"Al-Shabab feels honoured to be included on the list. We are good Muslims and the Americans are infidels. We are on the right path," he said.
But he rejected the US's accusations that members of the group are linked to al-Qaeda.
"We are fighting a jihad to rid Somalia of the Ethiopians and its allies, the secular Somali stooges," he said.
For more criticism on the US efforts to force the opposition into alignment w/ AQ, refer to the April 2008 report (pdf) by the Senlis Council.
Since that report the US has forced a change in the TFG, replacing the leadership w/ their own selections, continued to pour millions of dollars into security forces to defend that regime, including overt arms shipments, continued a propaganda campaign to shape international perceptions of the situation in Somalia, and so on. All of this strenthens the analysis that conditions have been created to push the remnants of the ICU still hostile to western meddling in their affairs toward finding themselves having more and more in common w/ the plight of Muslims in similar contexts across the globe. It's not rocket science to figure out that some figures will give voice to ideas that reinforce points made by UBL et al regarding the west's open war on Islam, nor that others are ready to exploit those at every opportunity.
I'll comment more on some of the recent stmts coming out of Somalia at a later time.
Finally, WRT to another generalization made in the comment, nobody here said anything about "simply blaming everything on the CIA" -- though the agency certainly has continuously made most things worse for the majority of Somalis for years on end -- but will keep it in mind that you take the thought so personal.